Bird A150

NETWORK
Technology GSM
2G bands GSM 900 / 1800
GPRS Class 4
EDGE No
LAUNCH
Announced 2004, Q2
Status Discontinued
BODY
Dimensions 83.5 x 42 x 19 mm (3.29 x 1.65 x 0.75 in)
Weight 85 g (3.00 oz)
SIM Mini-SIM
DISPLAY
Type TFT, 65K colors
Size
Resolution 128 x 160 pixels
Second external mono display
MEMORY
Card slot No
Phonebook 400 entries, Photo call
Call records 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls
MAIN CAMERA
Single VGA
Video Yes
SELFIE CAMERA
No
SOUND
Loudspeaker No
Alert types Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic ringtones
3.5mm jack No
COMMS
WLAN No
Bluetooth No
Positioning No
Radio No
USB
FEATURES
Sensors
Messaging SMS, EMS, MMS
Browser WAP 1.2.1
Games Yes
Java No
Calculator
Voice memo
BATTERY
Type Removable Li-Ion battery
MISC
Colors Silver

Bird A150 Overall Review

The Bird A150, announced in Q2 2004, is a product of its time, embodying the characteristics of early mobile phones before the smartphone era. It featured a TFT, 65K colors display, a standard for the period, offering sufficient clarity and color depth for basic use such as texting and simple graphical interfaces.

Powered by a 920 mAh battery, the A150 was designed for longevity in standby and talk times, catering to the primary need for communication over voice calls and SMS. Devices from this era often came with limited onboard storage, relying on physical storage expansion or not offering any at all, which was typical for the simpler, less data-intensive applications they supported.

The Bird A150, like many phones of its time, focused on core functionalities, including making calls, texting, and basic multimedia capabilities like ringtones and simple games. The connectivity options would have been limited to what was standard at the time, such as 2G networks, with no or very limited internet browsing capabilities.

Bird A150 Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Durable design typical of early 2000s mobile phones, made to withstand daily use.
  • Long battery life for its primary functions, owing to the 920 mAh battery.
  • Simple user interface, catering to those seeking basic phone functionalities without the complexity of modern smartphones.

Cons:

  • Limited functionality beyond voice calls and text messaging, reflecting the technological limitations of the time.
  • No support for modern apps or services, making it unsuitable for current standards of connectivity and entertainment.
  • The display and camera capabilities, if any, would be considerably outdated by today’s standards.